the Rational Radical  
 
  
 


   

 

 

 

 

  

:: The Rational Radical Blog ::

Home | Contact | | SUBSCRIBE: Site Feed


Powered by FeedBlitz 


Powered by FeedBlitz 

Monday, January 24, 2005

McDonalds Hot Coffee Lawsuit Facts

Here's what the talk show pundits and columnists neglected to mention about the McDonalds coffee burn case:
79 year old Stella Liebeck suffered third degree burns on her groin and inner thighs while trying to add sugar to her coffee at a McDonalds drive through. Third degree burns are the most serious kind of burn. McDonalds knew it had a problem. There were at least 700 previous cases of scalding coffee incidents at McDonalds before Liebeck's case. McDonalds had settled many claim before but refused Liebeck's request for $20,000 compensation, forcing the case into court. Lawyers found that McDonalds makes its coffee 30-50 degrees hotter than other restaurants, about 190 degrees. Doctors testified that it only takes 2-7 seconds to cause a third degree burn at 190 degrees. McDonalds knew its coffee was exceptionally hot but testified that they had never consulted with burn specialist. The Shriner Burn Institute had previously warned McDonalds not to serve coffee above 130 degrees. And so the jury came back with a decision- $160,000 for compensatory damages. But because McDonalds was guilty of "willful, reckless, malicious or wanton conduct" punitive damages were also applied. The jury set the award at $2.7 million. The judge then reduced the fine to less than half a million. Ms. Liebeck then settled with McDonalds for a sum reported to be much less than a half million dollars. McDonald's coffee is now sold at the same temperature as most other restaurants.
I know this is from a long time ago, but the right-wing screamers will be screaming about it again, so best to know the facts.


Jack Clark 1:28 AM [+]
Post #110655531391222371


Comments:


Excellent article! I'm sick and tired of the Right Wing Media lying with their bias view of this story.

 


This isn't a left/right wing issue. It's a issue of disinformation used to reaffirm people's preconceived notion of massive frivolous lawsuits across the country.

 
Post a Comment


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

 
Latest Updates on my BLOG!!

 

 

 

     

         

  

   

 

 

 

   

 

   

  

Comments

 

 

 
   

Home

 Copyright 2001-05    All rights reserved